Q: What makes for a good KT CV?
What I’d like to know is, What makes for a good “KT CV”?
I’ve heard before that a CV that’s ‘all over the place’, so to speak, looks bad. So for instance, a more or less conventional presentation might list your publications or presentations chronologically, but if your work is of that sort that you contribute KT support to a range of disciplines/body parts/sectors, your CV might look scattered.
Has anyone a story to share about the construction of &/or reception to their “KT CV”?
Cheers,
Ryan